|
Edited by xoxoxoxo at 2024-10-4 12:44
Scr*bd is trying very hard to pretend thats what it isnt doing. It is partnering with content creators for subscriber content, and some content creators put previews on the site. So its in their interest to not annoy too many people.
With dot com domains, trying to lodge a complaint in order to deregister it becomes very murky when it involves international laws and intellectual property. With just the matter of the actual website remaining online, regardless of the domain name, its extremely difficult to take it down, which is why a certain famous t*rrent site is, last I checked, being hosted in a nuclear bunker, while its registered domain name keeps changing as it keeps abreast of domain name takedown challenges. The yo yo ho bottle of rum high seas community just routes around domain name changes, with several shadow libraries and backups distributing its hosted content widely.
The internet was originally developed by the US Dept of Defense to be resilient in the event of nuclear war, which means that any takedowns are simply routed around. It is extremely difficult to block it, so props to those, aahh, robust regimes who manage to mostly do it, save for the resourceful citizens who manage to tunnel through. I remember talking to an Iranian woman in another place who used VPN to just access some Western knitting patterns, and, well, anything outside. And of course, a lot of people in some countries where crafts like knitting and crochet are popular cannot actually access Western payment systems, so even if they do have the personal wealth to compare with foreign exchange prices, they cant buy from international designers. The idea of intellectual property is also a particularly Western (and relatively new) idea, and while the way it is set up in many economies does fund a lot of very creative and hardworking peoples livelihoods, it is actually quite foreign to many, and so sharing freely is not particularly morally problematic. The laws may also be looser, see efforts to take down "foreign" sites which are considered to not adhere to Western IP. It is also notable that in most Western countries, IP violations are not considered to be the same as theft, as they do not "permanently deprive" anyone of anything. Certainly those in the West who never would have had the money in the first place agree with this. |
|